You must be signed in to submit a project.
Please see the Schedule and Judging Criteria for details.
$ cat /etc/cookies.conf
We use cookies to understand how people use this site.
Analytics cookies help us improve your experience.
They are off by default. Nothing tracks you until you say so.
$ select cookie_preferences
Entries for the ElevenLabs Worldwide Hackathon hackathon.
Team not found: x
Please see the Schedule and Judging Criteria for details.
These are the judging criteria we’ll use to evaluate projects:
| Criterion | What Judges Look For | Scoring (1‑5) |
|---|---|---|
| Working Prototype | The submission must run end‑to‑end and demonstrate the agent’s core functionality. | 1) Code does not run at all. 2) Major crashes or missing core features. 3) Partial functionality, major bugs remain. 4) Mostly stable with minor bugs. 5) Fully functional, polished, and ready for demo. |
| Technical Complexity & Integration | Depth of AI/LLM usage, tool‑use APIs, multimodal handling, and seamless integration of browser, voice, cloud, or tool agents. | 1) Simple static mock‑up. 2) Basic API call without real‑time interaction. 3) Moderate use of one modality (e.g., only voice). 4) Sophisticated multi‑modal integration (e.g., browser + voice). 5) Advanced orchestration across several agents with robust error handling and real‑world data pipelines. |
| Innovation & Creativity | Novelty of the agent concept, clever problem framing, and original solution design. | 1) Replicates an existing demo. 2) Minor tweak of known idea. 3) Useful but not surprising. 4) Creative twist or new application of known tech. 5) Groundbreaking agent that opens a new use‑case or paradigm. |
| Real‑World Impact | Potential to solve a tangible problem, user value, scalability, and deployment readiness. | 1) Purely academic or toy example. 2) Interesting but limited user relevance. 3) Solves a niche need. 4) Addresses a clear market or social need. 5) Demonstrates life‑changing or large‑scale impact potential (e.g., accessibility, productivity gains). |
| Theme Alignment | How well the project embodies the hackathon’s focus on conversational agents. | 1) Barely related to agents (e.g., generic UI) 2) Superficial mention of agents without functional demo. 3) Agent that uses one partner technology but ignores all other. 4) Clear multi‑agent implementation that showcases at least two partner technologies. 5) Exemplifies the theme perfectly, integrating conversational agents into a cohesive autonomous assistant. |
This milestone has passed
The team formation deadline has passed, but you may still create or join a team now if you need to.
This milestone has passed
hint: You may still make edits to your submission up until the time you are actually judged.
This milestone has passed
This milestone has passed
Times shown are in Europe/Lisbon time.